I bought an R with the RF 24-105 L about 3 years ago, and I added the 24-105 RF STM a year ago for ease of carrying. The RF L lens is clearly the best, as it should be, given the price. But there's very little in it between the STM and the EF L - optical performance is remarkably similar - weakest at 24mm, otherwise pretty decent. Usable Aperture Range: I often just set it either at F4 or F8 and have no issues. Low light performance on the Canon R6 is actually quite nice, you can probably expect this lens (in this setup) to act more like a F2.8 lens on older DLSRs when low light performance is considered. Bodies Used On: Canon R6, Canon R5. Source: MPB

Canon EOS RP, Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS at 24mm, hand-held at 1/8 at f/4.5 at Auto ISO 800, Perfectly Clear. bigger. Ocre Walls, New Orleans, Louisiana, February, 2019. Canon EOS RP, Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS at 24mm, hand-held at 1/8 at f/4.5 at Auto ISO 1,250, Perfectly Clear. bigger or full-resolution.

The 14-35mm f/4L is a surprisingly compact and lightweight lens, being even lighter and smaller than the already fairly compact RF 24-105mm f/4L. It has a standard front element that takes front-mounting 77mm filters, and it sacrifices nothing on the long end of the zoom range, going all the way from 14mm ultra-wide angle to 35mm. Together with IBIS it allows to shoot 1/4th of a second at 105mm with quite consistently sharp results. - RF has way faster AF. - both IS and AF are much quieter with RF. - EF feels more rigid thanks to its metal body. - EF suffers from the barrel wobble at 24mm. No impact on IQ, it is just the feel. SHsDmi.
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/395
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/292
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/321
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/113
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/364
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/197
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/64
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/351
  • jkmro7b8a6.pages.dev/95

    • canon rf 24 105 f4 l review